UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. PENNY JILLEAN CHRISTENSON, —

Eighth Circuit

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. PENNY JILLEAN CHRISTENSON, —

424 F.3d 852

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2005·No. 04-2084·Published

Opinion

424 F.3d 852

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellant,
v.
Penny Jillean CHRISTENSON, Defendant — Appellee.

No. 04-2084.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

September 27, 2005.

Richard L. Murphy, AUSA, argued, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for appellant.

John P. Messina, AFPD, argued, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellee.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, BEAM, ARNOLD, MURPHY, BYE, RILEY, MELLOY, SMITH, COLLOTON, GRUENDER and BENTON, Circuit Judges, en banc.

ORDER

On rehearing en banc, the district court's judgment is affirmed by vote of an equally divided court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

424 F.3d 852

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellant,
v.
Penny Jillean CHRISTENSON, Defendant — Appellee.

No. 04-2084.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

September 27, 2005.

Richard L. Murphy, AUSA, argued, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for appellant.

John P. Messina, AFPD, argued, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellee.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, BEAM, ARNOLD, MURPHY, BYE, RILEY, MELLOY, SMITH, COLLOTON, GRUENDER and BENTON, Circuit Judges, en banc.

ORDER

On rehearing en banc, the district court's judgment is affirmed by vote of an equally divided court.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. PENNY JILLEAN CHRISTENSON, —, 424 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

424 F.3d 852 (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. PENNY JILLEAN CHRISTENSON, —) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.