United States of America v. Kofi Sarfo, Rose Sarfo, Vista Medical Associates, Inc., KR Sarfo Family Trust, and Kofirose LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided July 6, 2026·No. 2:23-cv-01193·Unknown

Opinion

TAOctDinDg ABtLtoArnNeCy HGEe neral of the United States First Assistant United States Attorney District of Nevada Nevada Bar Number 8264 Assistant United States Attorney 501 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6336 Daniel.Hollingsworth@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT United States of America, 2:23-CV-1193-GMN-DJA Plaintiff, Order Granting Stipulation for Entry of Judgment of Forfeiture as to Kofi Sarfo, v. Rose Sarfo, Vista Medical Associates, Inc., KR Sarfo Family Trust, and Kofirose LLC All securities in TD Ameritrade account 426- 845882 in the name of Kofi Sarfo and Rose Sarfo, Defendant. The United States and Kofi Sarfo; his counsel, Kwame Jangha Manley, Leo R. Tsao, and Robert M. Draskovich, Jr.; Rose Sarfo, her counsel, Paul S. Padda; Vista Medical Associates, Inc.; KR Sarfo Family Trust; and Kofirose LLC agree as follows: 1. The Grand Jury indicted Kofi Sarfo and Rose Sarfo in United States v. Kofi Sarfo and Rose Sarfo, 2:23-CR-00132-APG-EJY. The United States brought a civil forfeiture in rem action, United States v. All Securities in TD Ameritrade account 426-845882 in the name of Kofi Sarfo and Rose Sarfo, now known as Charles Schwab account in the name of Kofi Ebenezer Sarfo & Rose Kyei-Sarfo Jt. Ten., account number 3473-9450, 2:23-CV-1193-GMN-DJA. 2. This civil forfeiture action seeks to forfeit All securities in TD Ameritrade account 426-845882 in the name of Kofi Sarfo and Rose Sarfo now known as Charles Schwab account in the name of Kofi Ebenezer Sarfo & Rose Kyei-Sarfo Jt. Ten., account number 3473-9450 under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1014; 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit 18 U.S.C. § 1014; 18 U.S.C. § 1343; 18 U.S.C. § 1349, conspiracy to commit 18 U.S.C. § 1343; 18 U.S.C. § 1344; U.S.C. § 1349, conspiracy to commit 18 U.S.C. § 1344; 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(@); 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), conspiracy to commit 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(a); 18 U.S.C. § 1957; and U.S.C. § 1956(h), conspiracy to commit 18 U.S.C. § 1957.! 3. The government incorporates the facts in the Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem and Kofi Sarfo’s and Rose Sarfo’s factual statements in their respective Plea Agreements in United States v. Kofi Sarfo and Rose Sarfo, 2:23-CR-132-APG-EJY into this stipulation as if fully set forth herein.” Sarfos do not contest that if the case were to proceed to trial, the government would have offered sufficient evidence to prosecute that the Sarfos controlled and used Vista Medical Associates, Inc.; KR Sarfo Family Trust; and Kofirose, LLC, to commit the above-named crimes and facts. 4. In Sarfos’ criminal case, counsel for Sarfos proposed a global settlement of the criminal case and this civil forfeiture in rem action to avoid further litigation by saving the parties’, their lawyers’, and this Court’s paucity of resources and time. Kofi Sarfo’s, Rose Sarfo’s, Vista Medical Associates, Inc.’s; KR Sarfo Family Trust’s; and Kofirose, LLC’s (Parties) signing this stipulation does not constitute admissions of facts and crimes. 5. The following shares from the above-named account were returned to Sarfos through the criminal case:* Alphabet [~Coinbase [60 Modema | 60] Shopify ... a enn Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (Complaint), ECF No. 1. * LRIA 10-3(a); Complaint, ECF No. 1; Kofi Sarfo’s Plea Agreement, ECF No.___ and Ros Sarfo’s Plea Agreement, ECF No. in 23-CR-132-APG-EJY. * United States v. Kofi Sarfo and Rose Sarfo, 23~-CR-132-APG-EJY, ECF No. 59.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America v. Kofi Sarfo, Rose Sarfo, Vista Medical Associates, Inc., KR Sarfo Family Trust, and Kofirose LLC, (D. Nev. 2026).

United States of America v. Kofi Sarfo, Rose Sarfo, Vista Medical Associates, Inc., KR Sarfo Family Trust, and Kofirose LLC (United States of America v. Kofi Sarfo, Rose Sarfo, Vista Medical Associates, Inc., KR Sarfo Family Trust, and Kofirose LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Honeycutt v. United States
581 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 2017)
United States v. Vassily Thompson
990 F.3d 680 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Abhijit Prasad
18 F.4th 313 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)