United States of America v. Eric Phillip Bufford
This text of 56 F.3d 65 (United States of America v. Eric Phillip Bufford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 65
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Eric Phillip BUFFORD, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 94-3811.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 24, 1995.
Before: MILBURN and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; TODD, District Judge*.
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable James D. Todd, United States District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 65, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19217, 1995 WL 316790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-v-eric-phillip-bufford-ca6-1995.