United States of America v. Centene Corporation

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: July 14, 2023
• Docket: 2:21-cv-01542
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., CASE NO. 2:21-cv-01542-DGE 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 v. 13 CENTENE CORPORATION et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16 This matter comes before the Court on its own motion following a review of the record. 17 On November 12, 2021, qui tam relator Gerardo Cosme brought this action against Defendants 18 on behalf of the United States and on his own behalf, alleging violations of the False Claims Act 19 (“FCA”). (Dkt. No. 1.) On October 26, 2022, the Government notified the Court of its decision 20 not to intervene in this qui tam action. (Dkt. No. 16.) On December 2, 2022, the Court granted a 21 motion by relator Cosme’s attorneys to withdraw as counsel of record. (Dkt. No. 19.) Cosme is 22 now proceeding pro se. 23 24 1 The Ninth Circuit has held that a pro se relator cannot prosecute a qui tam action on 2 behalf of the United States. Stoner v. Santa Clara County Office of Education, 502 F.3d 1116, 3 1127 (9th Cir. 2007). On March 21, 2023, the Government informed the Court that relator 4 Cosme had not yet retained new counsel, but was “actively seeking representation.” (Dkt. No.

5 20.) In the nearly four months since the Court received this status update, no attorney has 6 appeared on relator’s behalf. 7 Accordingly, the Court orders relator Cosme to show cause, no later than July 28, 2023 8 why this case should not be dismissed. 9 Dated this 14th day of July, 2023. 10 A 11 David G. Estudillo 12 United States District Judge

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24