United States of America v. $755,831 in United States Currency; Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez, Claimant

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 9, 2026·No. 2:25-cv-00310·Unknown

Opinion

TODD BLANCHE Deputy Attorney General of the United States 2||SIGAL CHATTAH First Assistant United States Attorney 3|| District of Nevada Nevada Bar No. 8264 4|| DANIEL D. HOLLINGSWORTH Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 1925 501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100 6|| Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel: (702) 388-6336 Fax: (702) 388-6787 Daniel.Hollingsworth@usdoj.gov 8 || Attorneys for the United States 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT {1 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 || United States of America, 2:25-CV-310-APG-DJA 13 Plaintiff, Stipulation for Entry of Judgment of Forfeiture as to Oliver Jair Martinez- 14 Vv. Mendez, and Order 15 ||$755,831 in United States Currency, 16 Defendant, 17 || Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez, 18 Claimant. 19 The United States and Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez, Claimant, through his counsel, 20 || Richard Wynn, Wynn Law Group, and Ismail Amin, The Amin Law Group NV., Ltd., 21 || stipulate as follows: 22 1. Claimant Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez and the government knowingly and 23 || voluntarily agree to resolve the forfeiture in this case to avoid further litigation. Rather than using this Court’s, the government’s, its attorneys’, Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez’s, and his attorneys’ scarce resources and time, Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez and the government 26 || knowingly and voluntarily agree to settle this case with prejudice. 27 2. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily agrees to the civil 28 || forfeiture of, and to the district court imposing the civil forfeiture of, the $755,831.

1 3. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily agrees to forfeit the 2 ||$755,831 to the United States. The parties knowingly and voluntarily agree the United 3 || States will forfeit the $755,831, return $151,166.20 of the forfeitable amount to Oliver Jair 4 || Martinez-Mendez, and retain $604,664.80 of the forfeitable amount. 5 4. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily agrees to relinquish 6 || all possessory rights, ownership rights, and all rights, titles, and interests in the property in 7 $755,831. 8 5. The execution of this Stipulation does not constitute any admission of fact or 9 || wrongdoing by Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez, the United States of America, United States 10 || Department of Justice, United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada, United 11 States Drug Enforcement Administration, the Internal Revenue Service-Cl, San 12 || Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, Bell Gardens Police Department, Riverside 13 || County Sheriff's Department, California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 14 || Montclair Police Department, Ontario Police Department, Redlands Police Department, 15 || Rialto Police Department, San Bernardino Police Department, State of California, Las 16 || Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, City of North Las Vegas Police Department, 17 || Nevada Gaming Control Board Enforcement Division, the State of Nevada, their agencies, 18 || their agents, and their employees. 19 6. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez and his attorneys knowingly and voluntarily 20 || agree to fill out the Department of the United States Treasury Automated Clearing House 21 ||(ACH) form accurately and correctly and submit it to the United States Attorney’s Office, 22 || District of Nevada, so the payment occurs by electronic fund transfer. 23 7. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily acknowledges, 24 || understands, and agrees that (a) federal law requires the United States Department of the 25 || Treasury and other disbursing officials to offset federal payments to collect delinquent tax 26 || and non-tax debts owed to the United States and to individual states (including past-due 27 || child support); (b) if an offset occurs to the payment to be made under this Stipulation, they 28 || will receive a notification from the United States Department of the Treasury at the last

1 || address provided by them to the governmental agency or entity to whom the offset 2 || payment is made; (c) if they believe the payment may be subject to an offset, they may 3 || contact the Treasury Department at 1-800-304-3107; (d) the terms of this Stipulation do not 4 || affect the tax obligations fines, penalties, or any other monetary obligations owed to the 5 || United States or an individual state; and (e) the exact sum delivered to Richard Wynn’s 6 || LOLTA account, on his behalf, may well be a lesser sum, if the Treasury Offset Program 7 ||reduces the amount in satisfaction of a debt obligation. 8 8. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily understands and 9 || agrees the $151,166.20 may be offset by any debt owed to the United States, any agency of 10 || the United States, or any debt in which the United States is authorized to collect. 11 9. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily understands and 12 || agrees that after the United States District Court has signed and entered this Stipulation 13 || concerning the $755,831 and signed and entered the Final Judgment of Forfeiture in this 14 case, within a practicable time thereafter for the United States, the United States agrees to 15 release to Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez one payment of $151,166.20 less any debt owed to 16 || the United States, any agency of the United States, or any debt in which the United States is 17 || authorized to collect, through Richard Wynn’s IOLTA account. 18 10. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez and the government knowingly and voluntarily 19 || understand and agree (1) each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses; (2 20 || the government settling this case is considered as substantially prevailing under 28 U.S.C. 21 || § 2465(b)(1); and (3) reasonable cause existed for the seizure, arrest, and forfeiture of the 22 ||$755,831. 23 11. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily understands and 24 || agrees to waive service of process and to waive any further notice to him, his agents, or his 25 || attorneys regarding the $755,831. 26 12. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily understands and 27 || agrees to waive his right to any judicial proceedings concerning the forfeiture of the 28 $755,831 (proceedings).

1 13. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily understands and 2 || agrees not to file any other documents in this case or any other case or proceeding 3 || concerning the $755,831. 4 14. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily agrees not to contest, 5 || and not to assist any other person and entity to contest, the forfeiture in any proceedings 6 || concerning the $755,831. 7 15. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily understands and 8 || agrees to withdraw his claim and answer filed in this case concerning the $755,831 when 9 || this Court grants this Stipulation. 10 16. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily understands and 11 || agrees to waive all constitutional, statutory, legal, equitable rights, defenses, and claims 12 || including, but not limited to, the stops, searches, seizures, and forfeiture of the $755,831 in 13 || any proceedings under the United States Constitution, Fourth Amendment. 14 17. Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez knowingly and voluntarily understands and 15 || agrees to waive the statute of limitations; the CAFRA requirements; the Supplemental 16 || Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, Federal Rule of 17 || Civil Procedure, (Supp. R.) A, G; other Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that are not 18 inconsistent with the Supp.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America v. $755,831 in United States Currency; Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez, Claimant, (D. Nev. 2026).

United States of America v. $755,831 in United States Currency; Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez, Claimant (United States of America v. $755,831 in United States Currency; Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez, Claimant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Honeycutt v. United States
581 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 2017)
United States v. Vassily Thompson
990 F.3d 680 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Abhijit Prasad
18 F.4th 313 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)