United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 0.53 Acre of Land, more or less, in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon PLAINTIFF the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

V. NO. 1:20-CV-77-DMB-DAS

AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER 0.53 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER GRANTING POSSESSION

This condemnation action is before the Court on the “Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of an Order of Immediate Possession.” Doc. #4. I Procedural History On April 22, 2020, the United States of America, upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”) filed a complaint in this Court “for the taking of property under the power of eminent domain and for the ascertainment and award of just compensation to the owners and parties in interest.” Doc. #1 at ¶ 1. Specifically, TVA asserts ownership of “a permanent easement and right-of-way,” id. at ¶ 6, on a strip of land “located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 18 North, Range 15 East, Oktibbeha County, State of Mississippi” (“Property”), id. at PageID #5. The complaint lists as defendants numerous individuals with interests in the Property. Id. at 2–3. Also on April 22, 2020, TVA filed a “Declaration of Taking,” signed by Michael Bernier from its General Counsel’s Office, Doc. #2-1; and a “Notice of Condemnation” identifying the Property and the defendants, Doc. #3. On April 27, 2020, TVA deposited $2,425.00 in the Court’s registry. The same day, TVA filed “Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of an Order of Immediate Possession,” which seeks “entry of an order putting [TVA] into possession of the easement and right-of-way herein condemned.” Doc. #4 at 2. II Analysis Congressional authorization is required for land to be condemned by the government for public use. Congress sometimes exercises the power of eminent domain directly by enacting a statute that appropriates specific property. Congress’s normal practice, however, is to delegate the power of eminent domain to government officers who may condemn property in the name of the United States for public use. And Congress may … grant condemnation power to private corporations executing works in which the public is interested. … When a condemnation action becomes necessary, a government official has two statutory methods available for exercising the power of eminent domain. Under the first method, called “straight condemnation,” the action usually proceeds to a determination of just compensation and final judgment before the condemnor takes possession. Under the second method, often referred to as “quick-take,” the government may take possession of the condemned property at the beginning of the case.

E. Tenn. Nat. Gas Co. v. Sage, 361 F.3d 808, 820–21 (4th Cir. 2004) (quotation marks, alterations, and citations omitted). This case involves a “quick-take” action brought by TVA, an entity authorized by Congress to exercise the power of eminent domain. See 16 U.S.C. § 831c(h). 40 U.S.C. § 3114, the quick-take statute, provides that “[o]n filing [a] declaration of taking and depositing in the court, to the use of the persons entitled to the compensation, the amount of the estimated compensation stated in the declaration,” three legal mechanisms occur: “(1) title to the estate or interest specified in the declaration vests in the Government; (2) the land is condemned and taken for the use of the Government; and (3) the right to just compensation for the land vests in the persons entitled to the compensation.” 40 U.S.C. § 3114(b). The statute further provides: The declaration of taking shall contain or have annexed to it—

(1) a statement of the authority under which, and the public use for which, the land is taken; (2) a description of the land taken that is sufficient to identify the land;

(3) a statement of the estate or interest in the land taken for public use;

(4) a plan showing the land taken; and

(5) a statement of the amount of money estimated by the acquiring authority to be just compensation for the land taken.

Id. at § 3114(a). The Declaration of Taking filed by TVA in this action meets the five declaration requirements. Specifically, the declaration (1) states the taking is authorized by the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 and that “[t]he public use for which [the Property] is taken is the erection, operation, and maintenance of electric power transmission circuits and communication circuits;” (2) includes an attachment describing land affected by the taking; (3) identifies the interest taken as an easement; (4) includes a map showing the land taken; and (5) states that $2,425 “is the amount estimated … to be just and liberal compensation” for the Property. Docs #2-1, #2- 2, #2-3. Additionally, as explained above, TVA deposited with the Court the estimated value of the Property. Under these circumstances, the Court concludes that TVA has complied with the requirements of the quick-take statute and that, therefore, title to the Property has vested in TVA, thereby entitling TVA to immediate possession. Accordingly, TVA’s motion for immediate possession will be granted. III Conclusion TVA’s motion for entry of an order of immediate possession [4] is GRANTED. All defendants to this action and all persons in possession or control of the property described in the complaint and Declaration of Taking in this case shall surrender possession of such property, to the extent of the estate condemned, to the TVA immediately. SO ORDERED, this 5th day of May, 2020. /s/Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE