United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford
343 F.3d 961, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10054, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18112, 2003 WL 22061604
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2003·No. 01-50633·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford, 343 F.3d 961, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10054, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18112, 2003 WL 22061604 (9th Cir. 2003).
343 F.3d 961 (United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Wagner
126 F. App'x 838 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Moreno v. Baca
400 F.3d 1152 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
R. Moreno v. Baca
400 F.3d 1152 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford
372 F.3d 1048 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Cormier v. United States
81 F. App'x 990 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)