United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford

343 F.3d 961, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10054, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18112, 2003 WL 22061604
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2003
Docket01-50633
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 343 F.3d 961 (United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford, 343 F.3d 961, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10054, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18112, 2003 WL 22061604 (9th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wagner
126 F. App'x 838 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Moreno v. Baca
400 F.3d 1152 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
R. Moreno v. Baca
400 F.3d 1152 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Cormier v. United States
81 F. App'x 990 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 F.3d 961, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10054, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18112, 2003 WL 22061604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-state-of-california-intervenor-v-raphyal-ca9-2003.