United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford
This text of 343 F.3d 961 (United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 F.3d 961, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 10054, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18112, 2003 WL 22061604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-state-of-california-intervenor-v-raphyal-ca9-2003.