United States of America, Plantiff-Appellee v. Elbert Grayson

625 F.2d 66
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 1980
Docket79-5550
StatusPublished
Cited by32 cases

This text of 625 F.2d 66 (United States of America, Plantiff-Appellee v. Elbert Grayson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, Plantiff-Appellee v. Elbert Grayson, 625 F.2d 66 (5th Cir. 1980).

Opinion

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge.

The only issue presented for review in this case is whether evidence consisting solely of the quantity of the controlled substance seized is sufficient to uphold an inference of intent to distribute. We hold that it is sufficient, and affirm.

Upon arrival at Miami International Airport from Santa Cruz, Bolivia, on May 3, 1979, Elbert Grayson was found to have concealed on his person four packages containing 413.1 grams of dilute cocaine hydrochloride. This amount is the equivalent of 304.77 grams of cocaine.

Grayson was convicted on both counts of a two-count indictment charging importation of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to concurrent terms of two years imprisonment on each count.

Intent to distribute a controlled substance under 21 U.S.C. § 841 may be inferred solely from possession of a large amount of the substance. United States v. Vomero, 567 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Johnson, 469 F.2d 973 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Mather, 465 F.2d 1035 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1085, 93 S.Ct. 685, 34 L.Ed.2d 672 (1972). In United States v. Mather we found the defendant’s possession of 197.75 grams of cocaine, without more, to be sufficient to support the inference that distribution was intended. Cf. Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970); United States v. Olvera, 523 F.2d *67 1252 (5th Cir. 1975). (In these cases, the amount of cocaine, less than one gram and two grams, was too small to infer intent to distribute.)

Because we find the cocaine found in Grayson’s possession to be of sufficient quantity to support an inference of intent to distribute, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Campos-Ayala
105 F.4th 235 (Fifth Circuit, 2024)
Ware v. United States
971 F. Supp. 1442 (M.D. Florida, 1997)
United States v. Joseph
800 F. Supp. 1303 (Virgin Islands, 1992)
United States v. Charles Shurn
849 F.2d 1090 (Eighth Circuit, 1988)
Pitts v. State
731 S.W.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
United States v. Victor Alfonso Colindres-Davila
804 F.2d 623 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Algar Ferguson v. Judge James A. Knight
792 F.2d 581 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Mario Prieto-Tejas
779 F.2d 1098 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Thomas Norman Gay
774 F.2d 368 (Tenth Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Cornelius Franklin
728 F.2d 994 (Eighth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Blasco
702 F.2d 1315 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio
702 F.2d 496 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Gary Sockwell
699 F.2d 213 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Ira Eugene Borchardt
698 F.2d 697 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Alvaro Chaparro-Almeida
679 F.2d 423 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Chaparro-Almeida
679 F.2d 423 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. David Thomas
676 F.2d 531 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 F.2d 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-plantiff-appellee-v-elbert-grayson-ca5-1980.