Home/Ninth Circuit/United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

194 F.3d 1340, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8762, 99 Daily Journal DAR 11207, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28405
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 1, 1999·No. 98-31021·Published

Opinion

194 F.3d 1340 (9th Cir. 1999)

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 98-31021, 98-30122.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

November 1, 1999

ORDER

Hug, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Working, 175 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1999), is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, 194 F.3d 1340, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8762, 99 Daily Journal DAR 11207, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28405 (9th Cir. 1999).

194 F.3d 1340 (United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3300, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4262 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Brenda Lee Working, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
175 F.3d 1150 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Working
194 F.3d 1340 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)