United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant v. Darrell Lee Tessier Sharon Yvonne Tessier Robert G. Drummond, Chapter 13 Trustee

127 F.3d 1106
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 1997
Docket96-35801
StatusUnpublished

This text of 127 F.3d 1106 (United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant v. Darrell Lee Tessier Sharon Yvonne Tessier Robert G. Drummond, Chapter 13 Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant v. Darrell Lee Tessier Sharon Yvonne Tessier Robert G. Drummond, Chapter 13 Trustee, 127 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

127 F.3d 1106

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
Darrell Lee TESSIER; Sharon Yvonne Tessier; Robert G.
Drummond, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellees.

Nos. 96-35801, MT-95-02336-VRH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 17, 1997.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, No. MT-95-02336-VRH; Volinn, Russell, and Hagan, Judges, Presiding.

Before: FERGUSON, BOOCHEVER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER*

We dismiss this appeal as moot because the underlying case was settled without reference to the question of the constitutionality of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb (1994). We decline the government's request to vacate the published opinion of the Bankruptcy Court, In re Darrell Lee Tessier, 190 B.R. 396 (Bankr.D.Mont.1995). In light of City of Boerne v. P.F. Flores, 117 S.Ct. 2157 (1997), we conclude that it will not spawn any untoward legal consequences nor have any precedential value. See Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 40 (1950).

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. Rule 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)
City of Boerne v. Flores
521 U.S. 507 (Supreme Court, 1997)
In Re Tessier
190 B.R. 396 (D. Montana, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 F.3d 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-intervenor-appellant-v-da-ca9-1997.