United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Wells Cargo, Inc. v. Alpha Energy and Electric, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 31, 2022·No. 2:18-cv-01182·Unknown

Opinion

Michael D. Stanger 1 || Nevada Bar No. 8272 STRONG & HANNI, P.C. 2 || 102 South 200 East, Suite 800 3 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 532-7080 4 || Facsimile: (801) 596-1508 Email: mstanger@ strongandhanni.com Kent F. Larsen, Esq. 6 || Nevada Bar No. 3463 5 SMITH LARSEN & WIXOM 1935 Village Center Circle 8 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Tel: (702) 252-5002 9 || Fax: (702) 252-5006 Email: kf1@slwlaw.com 10 || Attorneys for Third Party Defendant 4 Southwestern Construction, Inc.

D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 g S UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR CASE NO: 2:18-cv-01182-JCM-CWH ci 14 || THE USE AND BENEFIT OF WELLS CARGO, INC., STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME a FOR REPLY MEMORANDUM IN Plaintitt, SUPPORT OF SOUTHWESTERN’S y MOTION FOR SUMMARY C47 JUDGMENT ALPHA ENERGY AND ELECTRIC, INC., . =&4© 18 || a Missouri Corporation, and American (First Request) = Contractors Indemnity Company, a 19 |) California corporation, 20 Defendants. >, || ALPHA ENERGY AND ELECTRIC, INC., a Missouri Corporation, 72 Third-Party Plaintiff, 23 v. 24 NORTHCON, INC., an Idaho Corporation; 25 || SOUTHWESTERN CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Utah Corporation; DOES | through 26 10; and ROE Corporations 1 through 10, 27 Third-Party Defendants. 28

Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective council of record an 5 pursuant to LR JA 6-1, hereby stipulate that Southwestern Construction, Inc. (“Southwestern’ 3 || shall have an extension to and including June 7, 2022, given the current due date of May 3 4 ||2022, to file its Reply Memorandum in Support of Southwestern’s Motion for Summat 5 Judgment. In support of this stipulation, the parties state as follows: 1. Southwestern’s Reply Memorandum is currently due on May 31, 2022. 8 2. Southwestern seeks an extension of time to and including June 7, 2022, to serve i 9 Reply Memorandum. 10 3. This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file any reply memoranda. i 4. This extension is requested to accommodate the litigation schedule of Mr. Stange 12 Southwestern’s lead counsel, as well as some Covid issues with Mr. Stanger’s sta 13

4 and co-workers, and time spent assisting Mr. Stanger’s wife who had surgery. %

< 5. The parties agree that Southwestern’s Reply Memorandum shall be due on or □□□□□

BB © fs Bas 16 June 7, 2022. 17 5 ~ 6. The parties move the Court to enter an Order consistent with this stipulation. to 18 DATED this 31‘ day of May, 2022. /s/ Michael D. Stanger 19 Michael D. Stanger 50 Kent F. Larsen, Esq. Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant 21 Southwestern Construction, Inc. 22 DATED this 31‘ day of May, 2022. /s/ Stephen J. Moore (Signed by Michael D. Stanger with 23 g y permission of Stephen J. Moore) 24 Stephen J. Moore Paul K. Hentzen, Esq. 25 Jakub P. Medrala, Esq. 46 Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Alpha Energy and Electric, Inc. 27 DATED this 31* day of May, 2022. /s/ Benjamin J. McDonnell 28 (Signed by Michael D. Stanger with

permission of Benjamin J. McDonnell) | Benjamin J. McDonnell 5 Ryan D. Yahne Donna DiMaggio 3 Brian W Boschee Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant 4 Northcon, Inc. > DATED this 31‘ day of May, 2022. /s/ Jordan F. Faux 6 (Signed by Michael D. Stanger with permission of Kurt C. Faux) 7 Kurt C. Faux, Esq. 8 Willi H. Siepmann, Esq. Jordan F. Faux, Esq. 9 Attorneys for American Contractors Indemnity Company 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED: 13

14 % is || Pete CO. teller ~ ||UNIFED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 “

DATED: _ May 31, 2022 17

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE > hereby certify that on this 31‘ day of May, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoin STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT O 3 || SOUTHWESTERN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT was electronically v ECF notification upon all counsel of record. 5 /s/ Michael D, Stanger 10 11 12 mo 13

|4

15 5 moO B . 16

BESS 1s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Wells Cargo, Inc. v. Alpha Energy and Electric, Inc., (D. Nev. 2022).

United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Wells Cargo, Inc. v. Alpha Energy and Electric, Inc. (United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Wells Cargo, Inc. v. Alpha Energy and Electric, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Moore
102 So. 200 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)