United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Company, Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. National Blasting Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party United Bonding Insurance Company, Etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party v. First National Bank of Venice, Fourth Party

First Circuit

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Company, Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. National Blasting Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party United Bonding Insurance Company, Etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party v. First National Bank of Venice, Fourth Party

417 F.2d 634

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 1969

Docket27158_1

StatusPublished

This text of 417 F.2d 634 (United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Company, Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. National Blasting Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party United Bonding Insurance Company, Etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party v. First National Bank of Venice, Fourth Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Company, Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. National Blasting Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party United Bonding Insurance Company, Etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party v. First National Bank of Venice, Fourth Party, 417 F.2d 634 (1st Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

417 F.2d 634

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A.
THARPE, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
NORFOLD DREDGING COMPANY, etc., et al.,
Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
NATIONAL BLASTING COMPANY, Inc.,
Third-Party Defendant-Fourth
Party Plaintiff.
UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Third-Party
Plaintiff-Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VENICE, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 27158.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1969, Rehearing Denied Dec. 29, 1969.

D. Lloyd Zook, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

W. Robert Mann, Bradenton, Fla., David A. Rhodes, Palmetto, Fla., L. Howard Payne, Venice, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in the trial judge's Consolidated Final Judgment and in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

417 F.2d 634

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A.
THARPE, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
NORFOLD DREDGING COMPANY, etc., et al.,
Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
NATIONAL BLASTING COMPANY, Inc.,
Third-Party Defendant-Fourth
Party Plaintiff.
UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Third-Party
Plaintiff-Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VENICE, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 27158.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1969, Rehearing Denied Dec. 29, 1969.

D. Lloyd Zook, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

W. Robert Mann, Bradenton, Fla., David A. Rhodes, Palmetto, Fla., L. Howard Payne, Venice, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in the trial judge's Consolidated Final Judgment and in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 F.2d 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-for-the-use-and-benefit-of-lee-a-tharpe-v-ca1-1969.