United States of America Ex Rel. William Davidson v. J. Edwin Lavallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, and the People of the State of New York

301 F.2d 902, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5397
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 1962
Docket27320
StatusPublished

This text of 301 F.2d 902 (United States of America Ex Rel. William Davidson v. J. Edwin Lavallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, and the People of the State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. William Davidson v. J. Edwin Lavallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, and the People of the State of New York, 301 F.2d 902, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5397 (2d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

301 F.2d 902

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. William DAVIDSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
J. Edwin LaVALLEE, as Warden of Clinton Prison, and the People of the State of New York, Appellees.

No. 327.

Docket 27320.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 12, 1962.

Decided April 12, 1962.

A. W. Sereysky, New York City, for petitioner-appellant.

Gretchen White Oberman, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Irving Galt, Asst. Sol. Gen., New York City, on the brief), for appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the order of the District Court for the Northern District of New York which denied the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus. We find that no federal question is raised in the application. Petitioner was represented by counsel when he was sentenced after his conviction in the state court. The sentence was within the power of the judge of the County Court, and the matters considered in connection therewith by the sentencing judge were those customarily considered on sentence and present no question of a violation of the requirements of due process. Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, 93 L.Ed. 1337 (1948).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. New York
337 U.S. 241 (Supreme Court, 1949)
United States ex rel. Davidson v. LaVallee
301 F.2d 902 (Second Circuit, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 F.2d 902, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-william-davidson-v-ca2-1962.