United States of America Ex Rel. William C. Richter v. Walter Tees, Warden, Eastern State Penitentiary

221 F.2d 563, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 1955
Docket11529
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 F.2d 563 (United States of America Ex Rel. William C. Richter v. Walter Tees, Warden, Eastern State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. William C. Richter v. Walter Tees, Warden, Eastern State Penitentiary, 221 F.2d 563, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543 (3d Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying, after hearing, a *564 writ of habeas corpus to the relator, who is a prisoner in the Eastern State Penitentiary of Pennsylvania under a judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions of the Peace of Philadelphia County. The relator alleged that he had been denied due process of law in his conviction by that court. Prior to his application to tae district court for a writ the relator had made a similar application to the Court of Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County. In his application to the state court the relator had made essentially the same allegations of denial of due process in his conviction. The Court of Common Pleas held a hearing at which the relator presented his testimony following which it dismissed his petition. Its order was affirmed on appeal by she Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Com. ex rel. Richter v. Burke, 1954, 175 Pa.Super. 255, 108 A.2d 293. Allocatur was denied by the Supreme" Court o:l Pennsylvania, 175 Pa.Super. XXV, and certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States, Richter v. Burke, 348 U.S. 850, 75 S.Ct. 77. All of the contentions now made by the relator were fully considered and satisfactorily disposed of in the opinion filed by the Superior Court. The district court diet not err in denying the writ.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States ex rel. Richter v. Rundle
227 F. Supp. 847 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 F.2d 563, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-william-c-richter-v-walter-tees-warden-ca3-1955.