United States of America Ex Rel. Thomas Griffin v. Edward J. Hendrick, Superintendent of County Prisons

360 F.2d 614, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 1966
Docket14525_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 360 F.2d 614 (United States of America Ex Rel. Thomas Griffin v. Edward J. Hendrick, Superintendent of County Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. Thomas Griffin v. Edward J. Hendrick, Superintendent of County Prisons, 360 F.2d 614, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140 (3d Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Griffin, appellant herein, was convicted in a Pennsylvania state proceeding on multiple charges of unlawful sale and possession of drugs and is presently serving an aggregate sentence of 15 to 30 years. Having exhausted his remedies of direct appeal and state ha-beas corpus, he applied to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied. United States ex rel. Griffin v. Hendrick, 217 F.Supp. 865 (E.D.Pa.1963).

Griffin had been convicted in a trial where taped recordings of certain of his telephone conversations, intercepted by means of wire taps, had been introduced into evidence. The sole grounds urged herein for issuance of the writ are: (1) that this violation of the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 605, makes such acquired evidence inadmissible in state as well as federal proceedings; and (2) the United States Constitution requires that such evidence be excluded from state proceedings.

Though, as was made manifest by the vigorous and thorough argument of counsel for appellant, recent Supreme Court decisions have defined areas of individual liberty which are constitutionally protected, cases such as Schwartz v. State of Texas, 344 U.S. 199, 73 S.Ct. *615 232, 97 L.Ed. 231 (1952), and Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 48 S.Ct. 564, 72 L.Ed. 944 (1928), remain the controlling authorities dispositive of the contentions herein adverse to the appellant. Hence, the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania of May 23, 1963 will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Douglas
236 N.E.2d 865 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
360 F.2d 614, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-thomas-griffin-v-edward-j-hendrick-ca3-1966.