United States of America Ex Rel. Samuel Stokes, C-6867 v. Joseph Brierley, Supt
This text of 467 F.2d 572 (United States of America Ex Rel. Samuel Stokes, C-6867 v. Joseph Brierley, Supt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is presently incarcerated in a state correctional institution serving a life sentence imposed following a conviction by a jury of first-degree murder. An appeal from the conviction was taken to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which affirmed. Commonwealth v. Stokes, 409 Pa. 268, 186 A.2d 5 (1962). The petitioner then sought relief under the Pennsylvania Post-Conviction Hearing Act of 1966. Relief was denied by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, and the denial was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Commonwealth v. Stokes, 440 Pa. 642, 270 A.2d 624 (1970).
A petition for habeas corpus was then filed in the district court on the ground that the confession introduced against petitioner at his original trial was coerced. The district judge carefully reviewed the entire record of the state proceedings, see Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963), concluded that the confession was voluntary, and denied the petition for habeas corpus.
Based upon our own independent review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
An appropriate order will be entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 F.2d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-samuel-stokes-c-6867-v-joseph-brierley-ca3-1972.