United States of America Ex Rel. Robert R. Moton v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Third Circuit

United States of America Ex Rel. Robert R. Moton v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

374 F.2d 115, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7086

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 15, 1967

Docket15683

StatusPublished

This text of 374 F.2d 115 (United States of America Ex Rel. Robert R. Moton v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America Ex Rel. Robert R. Moton v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 374 F.2d 115, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7086 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The questions raised by the petition, and argued on this appeal, relate solely to the application of the Board of Parole Act of Pennsylvania as amended, 61 P.S. § 331.1 et seq. We can find no unconstitutionality in the Act as applied in the case of the appellant.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Note: This appeal has been ably argued by George J. O’Neill, Esq., appearing on behalf of the appellant under appointment by this Court, and Edward J. Martin, Esq., Assistant District Attorney of Allegheny County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The questions raised by the petition, and argued on this appeal, relate solely to the application of the Board of Parole Act of Pennsylvania as amended, 61 P.S. § 331.1 et seq. We can find no unconstitutionality in the Act as applied in the case of the appellant.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Note: This appeal has been ably argued by George J. O’Neill, Esq., appearing on behalf of the appellant under appointment by this Court, and Edward J. Martin, Esq., Assistant District Attorney of Allegheny County.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 F.2d 115, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-robert-r-moton-v-james-f-maroney-ca3-1967.