United States of America Ex Rel. Ray Jordan, D-134 v. Common Pleas Court at Philadelphia

Third Circuit

United States of America Ex Rel. Ray Jordan, D-134 v. Common Pleas Court at Philadelphia

451 F.2d 598, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6700

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 1971

Docket18439

StatusPublished

This text of 451 F.2d 598 (United States of America Ex Rel. Ray Jordan, D-134 v. Common Pleas Court at Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America Ex Rel. Ray Jordan, D-134 v. Common Pleas Court at Philadelphia, 451 F.2d 598, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6700 (3d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner in this habeas corpus proceeding is seeking release from imprisonment imposed pursuant to a conviction for first degree murder. The district court granted an evidentiary hearing on the petition with particular reference to a contention that an involuntary confession had been introduced at petitioner’s trial. The court found that the statement in question had been made voluntarily and that it had been introduced into evidence with the consent and even at the urging of the accused because of exculpatory matter it contained. On the record these findings were justified. We conclude that no constitutional right was violated by the use of this evidence.

We have considered all other points urged on this appeal and find no denial of constitutional right.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner in this habeas corpus proceeding is seeking release from imprisonment imposed pursuant to a conviction for first degree murder. The district court granted an evidentiary hearing on the petition with particular reference to a contention that an involuntary confession had been introduced at petitioner’s trial. The court found that the statement in question had been made voluntarily and that it had been introduced into evidence with the consent and even at the urging of the accused because of exculpatory matter it contained. On the record these findings were justified. We conclude that no constitutional right was violated by the use of this evidence.

We have considered all other points urged on this appeal and find no denial of constitutional right.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 F.2d 598, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-ray-jordan-d-134-v-common-pleas-court-at-ca3-1971.