Home/Third Circuit/United States of America Ex Rel. Lawrence Pierce v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison Farm, Rahway, New Jersey

United States of America Ex Rel. Lawrence Pierce v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison Farm, Rahway, New Jersey

374 F.2d 472, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6958
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 1967
Docket16330
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 374 F.2d 472 (United States of America Ex Rel. Lawrence Pierce v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison Farm, Rahway, New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. Lawrence Pierce v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison Farm, Rahway, New Jersey, 374 F.2d 472, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6958 (3d Cir. 1967).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Appellee was convicted of the crime of robbery in a New Jersey court. He made application for a writ of habeas corpus to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. He sought a new trial because the testimony in regard to the voluntariness of his incriminating statement was heard and determined by the trial judge in the presence of the jury. The District Court granted the writ and allowed the petitioner a new trial on the merits. That decision was plaihly right.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed on the sound opinion of Judge Wortendyke which was filed September 29, 1966, 259 F.Supp. 729.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dempsey v. State
330 A.2d 204 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
Chapman v. State
162 N.W.2d 698 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1968)
People v. Sayers
240 N.E.2d 540 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
State v. Soliz
442 P.2d 575 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
Murphy v. State
426 S.W.2d 509 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1968)
Carter v. Eyman
281 F. Supp. 776 (D. Arizona, 1968)
Smith v. State
210 So. 2d 826 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
Henry A. Vigliano v. Honorable John G. Thevos, Hon. John Doe (Fictitious) and Hon. John F. Crane, Defendants-Respondents
390 F.2d 55 (Third Circuit, 1968)
Dell v. State
231 N.E.2d 522 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Sayers
28 A.D.2d 227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
People v. Doherty
429 P.2d 177 (California Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Broxton
230 A.2d 489 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1967)
Jenkins v. State
230 A.2d 262 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1967)
Thomas v. State
268 F. Supp. 383 (D. New Jersey, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 F.2d 472, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-lawrence-pierce-v-warren-pinto-ca3-1967.