United States of America Ex Rel. Kenneth Headley, Bobby Sams and Charles Huntley v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden, Attica Prison, Attica, New York

415 F.2d 277, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10814
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedSeptember 12, 1969
Docket33592_1
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 415 F.2d 277 (United States of America Ex Rel. Kenneth Headley, Bobby Sams and Charles Huntley v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden, Attica Prison, Attica, New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. Kenneth Headley, Bobby Sams and Charles Huntley v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden, Attica Prison, Attica, New York, 415 F.2d 277, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10814 (2d Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The habeas corpus petitions of these New York State prisoners serving sentences for robbery in the first degree were consolidated for consideration by the district court.

Petitioners moved for permission to amend their petitions by adding claims under Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968) and Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293, 88 S.Ct. 1921, 20 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1968). Their motion was denied and they appeal.

Ordinarily we would be unwilling to entertain an appeal from such an order, since there are still pending before the district court a number of other claims of petitioners. However, in view of our determination that petitioners must seek relief in the state courts of New York, we believe that we would not be justified in imposing upon them the delay which would be involved in returning them to the district court for a complete consideration of their petitions before accepting the appeal.

On the Bruton issue itself, we affirm the determination of the district court requiring the petitioners to exhaust the New York State remedy available to them under People v. Pohl, 23 N.Y.2d 290, 296 N.Y.S.2d 352, 244 N.E.2d 47 (1968). See United States ex rel. Smith v. Follette, 405 F.2d 1199 (2d Cir. 1969); United States ex rel. Sloan v. McMann, 415 F.2d 275 (2d Cir. 1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 F.2d 277, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-kenneth-headley-bobby-sams-and-charles-ca2-1969.