United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph M. Ryan v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, William J. Banmiller, Warden
This text of 288 F.2d 453 (United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph M. Ryan v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, William J. Banmiller, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case arises as a collateral attack in a federal district court upon a murder conviction in a state court and the consequent sentence of the accused to life imprisonment. The conviction is said to have been essentially unfair and, therefore, unconstitutional in that two of the twelve jurors did not concur in the verdict of guilty. However, the appellant failed to present substantial evidence to support his charge that the verdict of the jury was not unanimous. Accordingly, the court below quite properly refused to disturb the conviction.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 F.2d 453, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-joseph-m-ryan-v-commonwealth-of-ca3-1961.