United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph D. Coffey v. Harold W. Follette, Warden, Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York

423 F.2d 750, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10578
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1970
Docket33841_1
StatusPublished

This text of 423 F.2d 750 (United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph D. Coffey v. Harold W. Follette, Warden, Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph D. Coffey v. Harold W. Follette, Warden, Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York, 423 F.2d 750, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10578 (2d Cir. 1970).

Opinion

423 F.2d 750

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Joseph D. COFFEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Harold W. FOLLETTE, Warden, Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 541.

Docket 33841.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued February 24, 1970.

Decided February 24, 1970.

Richard Harbus, New York City, for appellant.

Joel Lewittes, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of the State of New York, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and CROAKE, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the denial by the district court, without a hearing, of this petition for habeas corpus claiming constitutional error.

Petitioner, found guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree on November 9, 1960, was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term of not less than six nor more than ten years imprisonment, which he is now serving. He bases this petition on a claim that his privilege against self-incrimination was violated by the introduction of certain statements at his trial. For the reasons stated in Judge Frankel's opinion below, reported at 310 F.Supp. 946 (1969), we hold that the petition was properly denied.

The court thanks Richard Harbus, Esq., for his conscientious efforts on this appointment.

Affirmed.

Notes:

*

Sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States ex rel. Coffey v. Follette
310 F. Supp. 946 (S.D. New York, 1969)
United States ex rel. Coffey v. Follette
423 F.2d 750 (Second Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 F.2d 750, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-joseph-d-coffey-v--ca2-1970.