United States of America Ex Rel. Jose Rivera, Relator-Appellant v. J. Edwin Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York

Second Circuit

United States of America Ex Rel. Jose Rivera, Relator-Appellant v. J. Edwin Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York

319 F.2d 849, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4800

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 27, 1963

Docket849

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 319 F.2d 849 (United States of America Ex Rel. Jose Rivera, Relator-Appellant v. J. Edwin Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America Ex Rel. Jose Rivera, Relator-Appellant v. J. Edwin Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York, 319 F.2d 849, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4800 (2d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Foley, J., denying without a hearing the appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

. Appellant’s counsel conceded at the argument of this appeal that the appellant has remedies presently available in the state courts. We find this to be the fact. See People v. Adams, 12 N.Y.2d 417, 240 N.Y.S.2d 155, 190 N.E.2d 529; People v. Stanley, 12 N.Y.2d 250, 238 N.Y.S.2d 935, 189 N.E.2d 478 (1963); People v. Siena (App.Div.), 240 N.Y.S.2d 565. Accordingly, the denial of this petition is affirmed. United States ex rel. Kling v. LaVallee, 306 F.2d 199 (2 Cir. 1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Foley, J., denying without a hearing the appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

. Appellant’s counsel conceded at the argument of this appeal that the appellant has remedies presently available in the state courts. We find this to be the fact. See People v. Adams, 12 N.Y.2d 417, 240 N.Y.S.2d 155, 190 N.E.2d 529; People v. Stanley, 12 N.Y.2d 250, 238 N.Y.S.2d 935, 189 N.E.2d 478 (1963); People v. Siena (App.Div.), 240 N.Y.S.2d 565. Accordingly, the denial of this petition is affirmed. United States ex rel. Kling v. LaVallee, 306 F.2d 199 (2 Cir. 1962).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

319 F.2d 849, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-jose-rivera-relator-appellant-v-j-edwin-ca2-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack