United States of America Ex Rel. James E. Kern v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pa

Third Circuit

United States of America Ex Rel. James E. Kern v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pa

403 F.2d 205

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 27, 1968

Docket17157

StatusPublished

This text of 403 F.2d 205 (United States of America Ex Rel. James E. Kern v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America Ex Rel. James E. Kern v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pa, 403 F.2d 205 (3d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying the petition of appellant, James E. Kern, for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant contends, among other things, that the district court erred in holding that both his guilty plea and written confession were voluntary, and that his confession was properly admitted into evidence at the state court hearing to determine his degree of guilt.

We have carefully examined the entire record in this case, and we have concluded that all of appellant’s contentions lack merit.

Accordingly, the order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying the petition of appellant, James E. Kern, for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant contends, among other things, that the district court erred in holding that both his guilty plea and written confession were voluntary, and that his confession was properly admitted into evidence at the state court hearing to determine his degree of guilt.

We have carefully examined the entire record in this case, and we have concluded that all of appellant’s contentions lack merit.

Accordingly, the order of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 F.2d 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-james-e-kern-v-james-f-maroney-ca3-1968.