United States of America Ex Rel. George P. Gelger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Third Circuit

United States of America Ex Rel. George P. Gelger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

384 F.2d 996, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5023

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 27, 1967

Docket15769_1

StatusPublished

This text of 384 F.2d 996 (United States of America Ex Rel. George P. Gelger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America Ex Rel. George P. Gelger v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 384 F.2d 996, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5023 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, represented by counsel, was tried by a jury and convicted of the murder of his former father-in-law. He was thereafter sentenced to a term of life imprisonment. The matter came before the court below on a petition for writ of habeas corpus in which the appellant challenged the constitutional validity of his conviction. District Judge Gourley concluded that appellant’s constitu *997 tional rights had not been abridged and the petition was denied. The present appeal is from the denial of the petition. We have considered the record and find no error.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, represented by counsel, was tried by a jury and convicted of the murder of his former father-in-law. He was thereafter sentenced to a term of life imprisonment. The matter came before the court below on a petition for writ of habeas corpus in which the appellant challenged the constitutional validity of his conviction. District Judge Gourley concluded that appellant’s constitu *997 tional rights had not been abridged and the petition was denied. The present appeal is from the denial of the petition. We have considered the record and find no error.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

384 F.2d 996, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-george-p-gelger-v-commonwealth-of-ca3-1967.