United States of America Ex Rel. Frederick A. McGrotty v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pa

356 F.2d 110
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1966
Docket15497_1
StatusPublished

This text of 356 F.2d 110 (United States of America Ex Rel. Frederick A. McGrotty v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. Frederick A. McGrotty v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pa, 356 F.2d 110 (3d Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Assuming, but not deciding, that the relator-appellant, McGrotty, has exhausted his state remedies, nonetheless we are unable to perceive any merit in his petition for habeas corpus or error in the proceedings below. Consequently the order of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 F.2d 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-frederick-a-mcgrotty-v-james-f-maroney-ca3-1966.