United States of America Ex Rel. Francis O'HallOran v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

384 F.2d 997
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 30, 1967·No. 16724·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by a state prisoner from a judgment denying him a writ of habeas corpus.

In the circumstances of this ease, we rule that the taking of the appellant’s fingerprints in open court, over his objection, was not a denial of fair trial or inconsistent with due process of law. No other point of substance is properly before us on this appeal.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America Ex Rel. Francis O'HallOran v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 384 F.2d 997 (3d Cir. 1967).

384 F.2d 997 (United States of America Ex Rel. Francis O'HallOran v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Tennessee v. Detrick Cole
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 2003
Commonwealth v. Moyer
461 A.2d 853 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
United States v. Jacqueline Peters and Pamela Teller
687 F.2d 1295 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
Alston v. State
352 A.2d 323 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1976)
State v. House
320 So. 2d 181 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1975)
State v. Anderson
528 P.2d 1003 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1974)
State v. Jamerson
518 P.2d 779 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1974)
Commonwealth v. Jefferson
281 A.2d 852 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Commonwealth v. Keeler
264 A.2d 407 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
United States v. Robert Lee Doremus, Sr.
414 F.2d 252 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)