United States of America Ex Rel. Francis O'HallOran v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
This text of 384 F.2d 997 (United States of America Ex Rel. Francis O'HallOran v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal by a state prisoner from a judgment denying him a writ of habeas corpus.
In the circumstances of this ease, we rule that the taking of the appellant’s fingerprints in open court, over his objection, was not a denial of fair trial or inconsistent with due process of law. No other point of substance is properly before us on this appeal.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
384 F.2d 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-francis-ohalloran-v-alfred-t-rundle-ca3-1967.