United States of America Ex Rel. Efraim Carrasquillo v. Dale Thomas, Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York City

Second Circuit

United States of America Ex Rel. Efraim Carrasquillo v. Dale Thomas, Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York City

677 F.2d 225, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20099

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 1982

Docket973

StatusPublished

This text of 677 F.2d 225 (United States of America Ex Rel. Efraim Carrasquillo v. Dale Thomas, Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America Ex Rel. Efraim Carrasquillo v. Dale Thomas, Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York City, 677 F.2d 225, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20099 (2d Cir. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

677 F.2d 225

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Efraim CARRASQUILLO,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dale THOMAS, Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center,
New York City, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 973, Docket 81-2442.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued March 31, 1982.
Decided April 14, 1982.

Alan Scribner, New York City (Ivan S. Fisher, David Ely, Michael Davies, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.

William J. Brennan, Asst. U. S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, New York City (John S. Martin, Jr., U. S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, Richard N. Papper, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge, and MISHLER, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Efraim Carrasquillo, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, Edward Weinfeld, J., which granted the government's motion to dismiss Carrasquillo's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The sole issue before us on appeal is whether criminal charges contained in an indictment dismissed with prejudice can form the basis for a subsequent revocation of parole. We find that the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment does not bar use of the charges in a parole revocation proceeding. Although the issue has not been squarely presented in this circuit, our decision here was presaged by Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 938, 944 (2nd Cir. 1976). Judge Weinfeld addressed the issue thoroughly and we affirm on the basis of his opinion, reported at 527 F.Supp. 1105.

Judgment affirmed.

*

Honorable Jacob Mishler, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

677 F.2d 225

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Efraim CARRASQUILLO,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dale THOMAS, Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center,
New York City, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 973, Docket 81-2442.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued March 31, 1982.
Decided April 14, 1982.

Alan Scribner, New York City (Ivan S. Fisher, David Ely, Michael Davies, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.

William J. Brennan, Asst. U. S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, New York City (John S. Martin, Jr., U. S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, Richard N. Papper, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge, and MISHLER, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Efraim Carrasquillo, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, Edward Weinfeld, J., which granted the government's motion to dismiss Carrasquillo's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The sole issue before us on appeal is whether criminal charges contained in an indictment dismissed with prejudice can form the basis for a subsequent revocation of parole. We find that the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment does not bar use of the charges in a parole revocation proceeding. Although the issue has not been squarely presented in this circuit, our decision here was presaged by Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 938, 944 (2nd Cir. 1976). Judge Weinfeld addressed the issue thoroughly and we affirm on the basis of his opinion, reported at 527 F.Supp. 1105.

Judgment affirmed.

*

Honorable Jacob Mishler, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 F.2d 225, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-efraim-carrasquillo-v-dale-thomas-warden-ca2-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack