United States of America Ex Rel. Earl Brogan v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pennsylvania
This text of 370 F.2d 331 (United States of America Ex Rel. Earl Brogan v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
In this petition for a writ of habeas corpus based on a Commonwealth of Pennsylvania conviction for aggravated robbery, there was an evidentiary hearing in the district court before Judge Allan Grim, since deceased. At that time petitioner was represented by two attorneys and testified. After Judge Grim’s death prior to formal decision, the matter was assigned to Judge Higginbotham. The latter “read with care” the record of the case in the district court “as well as the exhibits and notes of testimony of the original trial and all briefs filed.” The court’s conclusion was “I find that none of the acts complained of by the relator constitute a violation of any of his federal constitutional rights.” The petition for habeas corpus was denied. Based on our independent examination of the Commonwealth and Federal records in the case, we are satisfied that the district court judgment is sound.
Said district court judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
370 F.2d 331, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-earl-brogan-v-david-n-myers-ca3-1967.