United States of America Ex Rel. David Coleman v. Wilfred L. Denno and Edward S. Silver

330 F.2d 441
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1964
Docket28643
StatusPublished

This text of 330 F.2d 441 (United States of America Ex Rel. David Coleman v. Wilfred L. Denno and Edward S. Silver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. David Coleman v. Wilfred L. Denno and Edward S. Silver, 330 F.2d 441 (2d Cir. 1964).

Opinion

330 F.2d 441

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. David COLEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Wilfred L. DENNO and Edward S. Silver, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 350, Docket 28643.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 12, 1964.
Decided April 6, 1964, Certiorari Denied June 22, 1964, See
84 S.Ct. 1938.

Jack L. Kroner, New York City (Stanley J. Levy, Frederick C. Stern and Martin Garbus, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner-appellant.

William I. Siegel, Asst. Dist. Atty., Kings County, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Edward S. Silver, Dist. Atty., Kings County, and Mortimer Sattler, New York City, on the brief), for respondents-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, SMITH, Circuit Judge, and LEVET,1 District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

It was well within the province of the New York Courts to determine whether the prosecutor's comments in summation, taken in the light of defense counsel's argument and the careful and categorical instructions of the trial judge, were so prejudicial to the defendant as to require a new trial of the charges which resulted in his conviction for murder in Kings County in 1960. For the reasons given by Judge Bryan in his detailed and exhaustive opinion reported at 223 F.Supp. 938, S.D.N.Y. (1963) we are convinced that the defendant was not deprived of any Constitutional rights. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The mandate shall issue in five days.

1

Sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coleman v. Denno
223 F. Supp. 938 (S.D. New York, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 F.2d 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-david-coleman-v-wilfred-l-denno-and-ca2-1964.