United States of America, and v. William Steven Davis

Fourth Circuit

United States of America, and v. William Steven Davis

16 F.3d 412, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7337, 1994 WL 34643

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 1994

Docket93-6806

StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 412 (United States of America, and v. William Steven Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America, and v. William Steven Davis, 16 F.3d 412, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7337, 1994 WL 34643 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

16 F.3d 412
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
William Steven DAVIS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6806.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided Feb. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-89-286, CA-92-436-2).

William Steven Davis, appellant pro se.

Lisa Blue Boggs, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greensboro, NC, for appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Motion for Reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-89-286; CA-92-436-2 (M.D.N.C. June 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

16 F.3d 412
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
William Steven DAVIS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6806.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided Feb. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-89-286, CA-92-436-2).

William Steven Davis, appellant pro se.

Lisa Blue Boggs, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greensboro, NC, for appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Motion for Reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-89-286; CA-92-436-2 (M.D.N.C. June 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 F.3d 412, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7337, 1994 WL 34643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-william-steven-davi-ca4-1994.