United States of America, and v. William Park Sollberger

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. William Park Sollberger

411 F.2d 1019, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12561

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 1969

Docket23924_1

StatusPublished

This text of 411 F.2d 1019 (United States of America, and v. William Park Sollberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America, and v. William Park Sollberger, 411 F.2d 1019, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12561 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We cannot agree that the evidence was insufficient.

An attack is made on the affidavit supporting the underlying search warrant. There are two facets on the affidavit for the search warrant. Each separated from the other is quite weak. Together they are quite enough. In our opinion it cleared the hurdles of Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 89 S.Ct. 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969).

An issue is made on the competence of a chemist to testify to a portion of her conclusions. On the record, we cannot agree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI