United States of America, and v. Ronald Lee Meyer, And
This text of 403 F.2d 52 (United States of America, and v. Ronald Lee Meyer, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
403 F.2d 52
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Ronald Lee MEYER, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 22358A.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
October 15, 1968.
Becker & Moore, (for Meyer), West Covina, Cal., Stephen Adams (for Campbell), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Charles H. Turner, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Ore., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this Dyer Act conviction we hold it was not error to permit one F.B.I. agent to sit at the government table during the trial although he was a witness. The instruction given on guilty knowledge was as good as the one submitted by the defendant, and it was adequate. The trial judge was a little impatient at one point, but the jury was adequately instructed on the point.
Other objections here were not properly made or preserved in the trial court, but we find them without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 F.2d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-ronald-lee-meyer-and-ca9-1968.