United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison
This text of 435 F.2d 555 (United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We reject the contention under the Sixth Amendment: Confrontation.
Commendably able counsel cites Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 91 S.Ct. 210, 27 L.Ed.2d 213. On the facts here, in our view it cuts against him. Also, we agree with the trial court that the statement of the absent witness was a verbal act.
On the point as to “why the defendant was arrested,” on which the defendant was not permitted to vindicate himself, we find the court’s ruling was within its sound discretion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 F.2d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-ronald-h-garrison-ca9-1971.