United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison

435 F.2d 555
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 7, 1971·No. 26551_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We reject the contention under the Sixth Amendment: Confrontation.

Commendably able counsel cites Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 91 S.Ct. 210, 27 L.Ed.2d 213. On the facts here, in our view it cuts against him. Also, we agree with the trial court that the statement of the absent witness was a verbal act.

On the point as to “why the defendant was arrested,” on which the defendant was not permitted to vindicate himself, we find the court’s ruling was within its sound discretion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison, 435 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1971).

435 F.2d 555 (United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dutton v. Evans
400 U.S. 74 (Supreme Court, 1970)