United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison

435 F.2d 555
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 1971
Docket26551_1
StatusPublished

This text of 435 F.2d 555 (United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, and v. Ronald H. Garrison, 435 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We reject the contention under the Sixth Amendment: Confrontation.

Commendably able counsel cites Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 91 S.Ct. 210, 27 L.Ed.2d 213. On the facts here, in our view it cuts against him. Also, we agree with the trial court that the statement of the absent witness was a verbal act.

On the point as to “why the defendant was arrested,” on which the defendant was not permitted to vindicate himself, we find the court’s ruling was within its sound discretion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dutton v. Evans
400 U.S. 74 (Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 F.2d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-ronald-h-garrison-ca9-1971.