United States of America, and v. Paul Dall Isom and Albert Arnold Orndoff
This text of 432 F.2d 1012 (United States of America, and v. Paul Dall Isom and Albert Arnold Orndoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
432 F.2d 1012
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Paul Dall ISOM and Albert Arnold Orndoff, Appellants.
Nos. 25581, 25582.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 9, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; M. D. Crocker, Judge.
Donald H. Hazel, Sanger, Cal. (argued) on 25581, Eugene W. Krum, Sanger, Cal. (argued) on 25582, for appellant.
Richard V. Boulger, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Dwayne Keyes, U.S. Atty., Fresno, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is reversed for the reason that there was not enough evidence of dominion and control by the defendants to sustain the conviction.
Cf. Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 418 F.2d 159.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 F.2d 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-paul-dall-isom-and-albert-arnold-orndoff-ca9-1970.