United States of America, and v. Paul Dall Isom and Albert Arnold Orndoff

432 F.2d 1012
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 9, 1970·No. 25582_1·Published

Opinion

432 F.2d 1012

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Paul Dall ISOM and Albert Arnold Orndoff, Appellants.

Nos. 25581, 25582.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 9, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; M. D. Crocker, Judge.

Donald H. Hazel, Sanger, Cal. (argued) on 25581, Eugene W. Krum, Sanger, Cal. (argued) on 25582, for appellant.

Richard V. Boulger, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Dwayne Keyes, U.S. Atty., Fresno, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is reversed for the reason that there was not enough evidence of dominion and control by the defendants to sustain the conviction.

Cf. Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 418 F.2d 159.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America, and v. Paul Dall Isom and Albert Arnold Orndoff, 432 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1970).

432 F.2d 1012 (United States of America, and v. Paul Dall Isom and Albert Arnold Orndoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related