United States of America, and v. Odell Andrews and Willie Sloan

439 F.2d 155, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10780
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 13, 1971·No. 26567·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

439 F.2d 155

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Odell ANDREWS and Willie Sloan, Appellants.

No. 26567.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 13, 1971.

Burton Marks, of Marks, Sherman & London, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.

Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Brain J. O'Neill, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction after remand, 426 F.2d 1304, of this judge-tried case is affirmed.

We hold it was not necessary to have a whole new tiral or to let defendant a whole new trial or to let defendant of a judge.

A close parallel is found in the case of Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 81 S.Ct. 421, 5 L.Ed.2d 428.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America, and v. Odell Andrews and Willie Sloan, 439 F.2d 155, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10780 (9th Cir. 1971).

439 F.2d 155 (United States of America, and v. Odell Andrews and Willie Sloan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Frank Nicholis Cepelis
443 F.2d 63 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)