United States of America, and v. Odell Andrews and Willie Sloan
This text of 439 F.2d 155 (United States of America, and v. Odell Andrews and Willie Sloan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
439 F.2d 155
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Odell ANDREWS and Willie Sloan, Appellants.
No. 26567.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 13, 1971.
Burton Marks, of Marks, Sherman & London, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Brain J. O'Neill, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction after remand, 426 F.2d 1304, of this judge-tried case is affirmed.
We hold it was not necessary to have a whole new tiral or to let defendant a whole new trial or to let defendant of a judge.
A close parallel is found in the case of Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 81 S.Ct. 421, 5 L.Ed.2d 428.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F.2d 155, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-odell-andrews-and-w-ca9-1971.