United States of America, and v. Luis Kaiser Peyton, United States of America, and v. Jose Agusto Marin
This text of 454 F.2d 213 (United States of America, and v. Luis Kaiser Peyton, United States of America, and v. Jose Agusto Marin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgments of conviction as to each defendant and as to each count are affirmed.
The counts involved the transportation of aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324.
A question of sufficiency of the evidence as to each defendant is raised. We find the evidence adequate.
The evidence showed that Marin launched the enterprise and Peyton carried it out. One Madden, later a government witness, was the intermediary.
Counsel seems to make the invalid assumption that the defendants had to be believed. This is simply not so. Also, the trier of fact could have drawn affirmative inferences of knowledge and intent from the denials made by the two defendants while on the stand.
*214 Marin claims that he was prejudiced by the failure of the government to produce one of the four aliens transported. He relies on United States v. Mendez-Rodriquez, 9 Cir., 1971, 450 F.2d 1. But in Mendez-Rodriquez the government apparently “returned” the witness to Mexico. Here the record is silent. So we do not know what happened to the missing alien. And we should not speculate. As it was, the government lost two counts of its indictment because of the absence of the fourth alien.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 F.2d 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-luis-kaiser-peyton-united-states-of-ca9-1972.