United States of America, and v. Juan Jose Celis

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. Juan Jose Celis

453 F.2d 9

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 17, 1971·No. 71-1890·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The conviction for the transportation and concealing of marijuana is affirmed.

We find the evidence (here challenged) as to knowledge was sufficient.

The admission of some real evidence (objects) not disclosed previously to the defendant by the government was within the trial court’s discretion. It was not the kind of thing that required research to rebut, if it was to be rebutted.

We find no error in the government’s argument or in the instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The conviction for the transportation and concealing of marijuana is affirmed.

We find the evidence (here challenged) as to knowledge was sufficient.

The admission of some real evidence (objects) not disclosed previously to the defendant by the government was within the trial court’s discretion. It was not the kind of thing that required research to rebut, if it was to be rebutted.

We find no error in the government’s argument or in the instructions.

United States of America, and v. Juan Jose Celis, 453 F.2d 9 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

453 F.2d 9 (United States of America, and v. Juan Jose Celis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.