United States of America, and v. Joseph Anthony Davis
This text of 447 F.2d 1376 (United States of America, and v. Joseph Anthony Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.
Davis contends that the implication of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295, 90 S.Ct. 506, 24 L.Ed.2d 532, and other cases require a finding here that induction was accelerated because of his delinquency. On the record, we think not.
United States v. Davis (9th Cir. 1970), 432 F.2d 1009; Misenhimer v. United States (9th Cir. July 22, 1971) 71-1384; and United States v. Pennington (9th Cir. 1971), 439 F.2d 145, require affirmance. We find United States v. Dobie, 444 F.2d 417 (4th Cir., 1971) distinguishable.
The mandate will issue now.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 F.2d 1376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-joseph-anthony-davis-ca9-1971.