United States of America, and v. Jose Vargas

436 F.2d 1280, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12544
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 5, 1971·No. 24938_1·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in their heroin case is affirmed.

The one serious point is the significance of 18 U.S.C. § 3109 on the facts here. Federal agents entered the apartment of Vargas through an open door, announcing an arrest of an associate (who later pleaded guilty). After entry a search followed the arrest, which uncovered heroin.

In our view, the thrust of Section 3109 (a request to permit entry) is aimed at the closed or locked door. Here we think the advance announcement of the officers’ identity and statement of purpose was sufficient. A significant factor here was the immediate presence of Vargas and his friend (about to be arrested) right inside the door. It was not a case of officers sneaking in and going prowling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America, and v. Jose Vargas, 436 F.2d 1280, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12544 (9th Cir. 1971).

436 F.2d 1280 (United States of America, and v. Jose Vargas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Ray Mendoza
281 F.3d 712 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
State v. Harada
41 P.3d 174 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2002)
United States v. Phillips
149 F.3d 1026 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Criales v. United States
621 A.2d 374 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Lillis v. State
335 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
United States v. Antonio Lopez
475 F.2d 537 (Seventh Circuit, 1973)
Jose R. Vargas v. United States
455 F.2d 501 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)