United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III

436 F.2d 419
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 1971
Docket25442_1
StatusPublished

This text of 436 F.2d 419 (United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III, 436 F.2d 419 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.

Qn the particular record here we find no error in denying a subpoena of a distant witness, in denying a subpoena for telephone company records in Florida, or in denying the appointment of an investigator. We find the Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694) point without merit. See United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

Other points not here mentioned we find without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
United States v. Gary Lee Hilliker
436 F.2d 101 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 F.2d 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-john-patrick-george-haslam-iii-ca9-1971.