United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III

436 F.2d 419

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 5, 1971·No. 25442_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.

Qn the particular record here we find no error in denying a subpoena of a distant witness, in denying a subpoena for telephone company records in Florida, or in denying the appointment of an investigator. We find the Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694) point without merit. See United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

Other points not here mentioned we find without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.

Qn the particular record here we find no error in denying a subpoena of a distant witness, in denying a subpoena for telephone company records in Florida, or in denying the appointment of an investigator. We find the Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694) point without merit. See United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

Other points not here mentioned we find without merit.

United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III, 436 F.2d 419 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

436 F.2d 419 (United States of America, and v. John Patrick George Haslam, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related