Home/Ninth Circuit/United States of America, and v. Jesus Alvarez-Franco, And

United States of America, and v. Jesus Alvarez-Franco, And

461 F.2d 1261, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8392
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 17, 1972
Docket71-3070
StatusPublished

This text of 461 F.2d 1261 (United States of America, and v. Jesus Alvarez-Franco, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, and v. Jesus Alvarez-Franco, And, 461 F.2d 1261, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8392 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We cannot conclude that the interrogation conducted by the court was improper.

We think there was a sufficient showing of willfulness and knowledge.

We conclude that the form of sentence was not permissible under Dear Wing Jung v. Uni,ted States, 312 F.2d 73 (9th Cir., 1962).

The case is remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dear Wing Jung v. United States
312 F.2d 73 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
461 F.2d 1261, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-jesus-alvarez-franco-and-ca9-1972.