United States of America, and v. James Mumow Valentine, And
This text of 472 F.2d 164 (United States of America, and v. James Mumow Valentine, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction in this marijuana importation case is affirmed.
All points in the attack on the composition of the trial jury have been heretofore resolved against the defendant in other eases in this circuit with the exception of the 40 mile rule on calling jurors. No showing is made that the rule is unreasonable or that defendant was prejudiced by it. Such a rule is authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(7).
We find the evidence of guilt was adequate. The refusal of the court to grant the motion for a mistrial was not error. The consecutive terms of imprisonment were proper. Cf. United States v. Bishop, 462 F.2d 127, 9 Cir. 1972.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 F.2d 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-james-mumow-valentine-and-ca9-1973.