United States of America, and v. Haywood Erwing, Jr.
This text of 439 F.2d 154 (United States of America, and v. Haywood Erwing, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
439 F.2d 154
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Haywood ERWING, Jr., Appellant.
No. 23309.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 13, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Raymond Plummer, Judge.
Michael Kennedy, of Kennedy & Rhine, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Crim. Div., Phillip W. Johnson, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and GOODWIN*, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The request to delay submission and strike brief is denied.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Counsel, Dennis J. Roberts, is authorized to withdraw as attorney of record.
Notes:
District Judge Alfred T. Goodwin, of the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F.2d 154, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-haywood-erwing-jr-ca9-1971.