United States of America, and v. Harold Wayne Lindsey

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. Harold Wayne Lindsey

436 F.2d 1385, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11928

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 10, 1971·No. 25941_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed in this bank robbery case.

A Miranda point is made (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694). The facts here fall within our United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

We find the assertion of inadequate representation to be without substance. It appears to have been quite competent, and the objections now are those of second guessing.

The length of the sentence is attacked and it is asserted there was obvious prejudice of the court. We cannot accept the validity of the assertion and we cannot review sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed in this bank robbery case.

A Miranda point is made (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694). The facts here fall within our United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

We find the assertion of inadequate representation to be without substance. It appears to have been quite competent, and the objections now are those of second guessing.

The length of the sentence is attacked and it is asserted there was obvious prejudice of the court. We cannot accept the validity of the assertion and we cannot review sentence.

United States of America, and v. Harold Wayne Lindsey, 436 F.2d 1385, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11928 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

436 F.2d 1385 (United States of America, and v. Harold Wayne Lindsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related