United States of America, and v. George Lee

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. George Lee

411 F.2d 1017

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 9, 1969

Docket23042_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 411 F.2d 1017 (United States of America, and v. George Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America, and v. George Lee, 411 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We find the objection to the information not well taken. Likewise, we find the objection based upon Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974, insubstantial. At the critical time Lee was not in custody and there was no restraint or threat to take him into custody. Further, we find on the record here no error in the receiving of evidence or in the instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We find the objection to the information not well taken. Likewise, we find the objection based upon Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974, insubstantial. At the critical time Lee was not in custody and there was no restraint or threat to take him into custody. Further, we find on the record here no error in the receiving of evidence or in the instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 F.2d 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-george-lee-ca9-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack