United States of America, and v. First National Bank of Arizona
Opinion
458 F.2d 513
72-2 USTC P 9655
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA, Appellant.
No. 26030.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 11, 1972.
Earl E. Weeks (argued), B. Michael Dann, of Streich, Lang, Weeks, Cardon & French, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellant.
Richard M. Roberts, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Joseph M. Howard, Crombie J. D. Garrett, Jane M. Edmisten, Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Richard Cormley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The summary judgment entered by the district court is affirmed.
We conclude that our Bank of Nevada v. United States, 251 F.2d 820 (9th Cir., 1957), requires this result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
458 F.2d 513 (United States of America, and v. First National Bank of Arizona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.