United States of America, and v. First National Bank of Arizona
This text of 458 F.2d 513 (United States of America, and v. First National Bank of Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
458 F.2d 513
72-2 USTC P 9655
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA, Appellant.
No. 26030.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 11, 1972.
Earl E. Weeks (argued), B. Michael Dann, of Streich, Lang, Weeks, Cardon & French, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellant.
Richard M. Roberts, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Joseph M. Howard, Crombie J. D. Garrett, Jane M. Edmisten, Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Richard Cormley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The summary judgment entered by the district court is affirmed.
We conclude that our Bank of Nevada v. United States, 251 F.2d 820 (9th Cir., 1957), requires this result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 F.2d 513, 30 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5488, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-first-national-bank-of-arizona-ca1-1972.