United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon

446 F.2d 224, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9107

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 7, 1971

Docket71-1134_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 446 F.2d 224 (United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon, 446 F.2d 224, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9107 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The main objection is that one exhibit was admitted without sufficient foundation. But we hold there was some identification and that the objection to admission was not specific enough.

As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure is not a legal requirement. United States v. Hull, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 1165, decided May 10, 1971.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The main objection is that one exhibit was admitted without sufficient foundation. But we hold there was some identification and that the objection to admission was not specific enough.

As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure is not a legal requirement. United States v. Hull, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 1165, decided May 10, 1971.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

446 F.2d 224, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-edward-elmer-dixon-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack