United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon

446 F.2d 224, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9107

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 7, 1971·No. 71-1134_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The main objection is that one exhibit was admitted without sufficient foundation. But we hold there was some identification and that the objection to admission was not specific enough.

As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure is not a legal requirement. United States v. Hull, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 1165, decided May 10, 1971.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The main objection is that one exhibit was admitted without sufficient foundation. But we hold there was some identification and that the objection to admission was not specific enough.

As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure is not a legal requirement. United States v. Hull, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 1165, decided May 10, 1971.

United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon, 446 F.2d 224, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9107 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

446 F.2d 224 (United States of America, and v. Edward Elmer Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related