United States of America, and v. Dorothy J. Henderson, Clyde Williams, Jr.
This text of 449 F.2d 788 (United States of America, and v. Dorothy J. Henderson, Clyde Williams, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
449 F.2d 788
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Dorothy J. HENDERSON, Clyde Williams, Jr., Appellants.
Nos. 26028, 26029.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 10, 1971.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1971.
Michael W. Roberts (argued), of Boyko & Simmons, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Eric Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty., & Chief, Criminal Division (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgments of conviction in this narcotics conspiracy case are affirmed.
Appellants' first point is concluded by Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610.
Objection is made to the search of an automobile when one Simpson was arrested. But the only important search was that of Simpson's pocketbook, and there was probable cause to arrest her and to search her pocketbook.
We have examined some twelve other points made and find them not substantial.
Bruce R. Thompson, judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
449 F.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-dorothy-j-henderson-clyde-williams-jr-ca9-1971.