United States of America, and v. David Russell Robinson

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. David Russell Robinson

435 F.2d 555

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 7, 1971

Docket25841

StatusPublished

This text of 435 F.2d 555 (United States of America, and v. David Russell Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America, and v. David Russell Robinson, 435 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Differences from United States v. Stark, 9 Cir., 418 F.2d 901, are not consequential.

Also, we find Chernekoff v. United States, 9 Cir., 219 F.2d 721, relied upon by appellant, to be of no help. In Chernekoff (our requirement on induction that the inductee be ordered to step forward) the service had violated its own definite regulation.

Here Robinson himself deprived the hospital of an opportunity to direct him to do any certain work.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Differences from United States v. Stark, 9 Cir., 418 F.2d 901, are not consequential.

Also, we find Chernekoff v. United States, 9 Cir., 219 F.2d 721, relied upon by appellant, to be of no help. In Chernekoff (our requirement on induction that the inductee be ordered to step forward) the service had violated its own definite regulation.

Here Robinson himself deprived the hospital of an opportunity to direct him to do any certain work.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 F.2d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-david-russell-robinson-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack